Protective equipment is essential in
many lines of work if the employer
is to adhere to Health and Safety
legislation.
Q. Do employers have
to provide PPE free of charge?
A. Yes, s.9 of the HSW Act
prohibits employers from charging
for PPE required to be provided
under any health and safety laws.
This includes PPE identified as
being necessary under the PPE
Regulations as a result of the risk
assessments carried out under MHSWR.
Employers will also have better
management of, and control over, any
PPE they provide and can therefore
ensure that it is maintained and
replaced as required. However, in
the case of Associated Dairies Ltd v
Hartley, an enforcement inspector
was found to have acted unreasonably
by serving an improvement notice
requiring the employer to provide
safety boots free of charge to
employees working in a certain area.
The employer successfully argued
that the existing system of
providing the boots at cost price on
a weekly repayment scheme (which was
in line with trade practice at the
time) was adequate and reasonable in
relation to the risk.
Q. What determines whether PPE is
suitable?
A. PPE is considered suitable if
it is:
- appropriate for, and
effective against, the risks it
is intended to protect against
- suitable for the environment
in which it is intended to be
used
- adjustable to fit the user
securely and comfortably.
Consideration should also be
given to the need for communication,
mobility and use in confined spaces.
Q. Are any items of PPE excluded
from the PPE Regulations?
A. Yes. The following items are
excluded:
- uniforms, eg for food
hygiene purposes
- work clothing which does not
offer protection against
identified risks
- sports equipment
- crash helmets required under
road traffic legislation.
Q. What if an employee refuses to
wear PPE which is identified as
necessary and is provided by the
employer?
A. There are several factors to
consider. Under regulation 10 of the
PPE Regulations, every employee is
required to use any PPE provided,
and employers must take all
reasonable steps to ensure that PPE
provided is used. Employees also
have a duty under s.7 of the HSW Act
to ensure their own health and
safety at work. Refusing to wear PPE
identified as necessary in order to
control exposure to certain
workplace risks is a breach of that
duty and of the PPE Regulations. The
employee could be liable for
prosecution. Employers must
establish the grounds on which the
refusal has been made, and whether
there is a sound reason why the
employee will not wear the PPE by
considering:
- is it uncomfortable to wear?
- does it restrict movement?
- does it create a greater
risk from another hazard,
compared to the one it is
intended to protect against?
- has the employee been made
aware of why the PPE is needed
and how to use it correctly?
As a last resort employers may
need to instigate disciplinary
proceedings - these should be part
of the organisation's health and
safety policy statement and
employment conditions. The bottom
line is that where the PPE is
necessary to protect against a
significant workplace risk the
employer must take all reasonable
steps to ensure that employees use
it - this is the criterion judges
will probably base any prosecutions
or civil claims on.
