employers-solicitors.co.uk - legal help and advice for your businessemployers-solicitors.co.uk - legal help and advice for your businessemployers-solicitors.co.uk - legal help and advice for your business
make an employment law enquiry on Employers-Solicitors.co.uk
your name
your email address

your phone number
please give us a brief description of your enquiry
please ensure you have entered a postcode
find a solicitor in your area with Employers-Solicitors.co.uk
find a solicitor in your area with AccidentCompensation.com
what can Employers-Solicitors.co.uk do for me and my business? legal help and advice information for solicitors wishing to join the newtwork Employers-Solicitors.co.uk homepage
 

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)- FAQ.

Protective equipment is essential in many lines of work if the employer is to adhere to Health and Safety legislation.

Q. Do employers have to provide PPE free of charge?

A. Yes, s.9 of the HSW Act prohibits employers from charging for PPE required to be provided under any health and safety laws. This includes PPE identified as being necessary under the PPE Regulations as a result of the risk assessments carried out under MHSWR. Employers will also have better management of, and control over, any PPE they provide and can therefore ensure that it is maintained and replaced as required. However, in the case of Associated Dairies Ltd v Hartley, an enforcement inspector was found to have acted unreasonably by serving an improvement notice requiring the employer to provide safety boots free of charge to employees working in a certain area. The employer successfully argued that the existing system of providing the boots at cost price on a weekly repayment scheme (which was in line with trade practice at the time) was adequate and reasonable in relation to the risk.

Q. What determines whether PPE is suitable?

A. PPE is considered suitable if it is:

  • appropriate for, and effective against, the risks it is intended to protect against
  • suitable for the environment in which it is intended to be used
  • adjustable to fit the user securely and comfortably.

Consideration should also be given to the need for communication, mobility and use in confined spaces.

Q. Are any items of PPE excluded from the PPE Regulations?

A. Yes. The following items are excluded:

  • uniforms, eg for food hygiene purposes
  • work clothing which does not offer protection against identified risks
  • sports equipment
  • crash helmets required under road traffic legislation.

Q. What if an employee refuses to wear PPE which is identified as necessary and is provided by the employer?

A. There are several factors to consider. Under regulation 10 of the PPE Regulations, every employee is required to use any PPE provided, and employers must take all reasonable steps to ensure that PPE provided is used. Employees also have a duty under s.7 of the HSW Act to ensure their own health and safety at work. Refusing to wear PPE identified as necessary in order to control exposure to certain workplace risks is a breach of that duty and of the PPE Regulations. The employee could be liable for prosecution. Employers must establish the grounds on which the refusal has been made, and whether there is a sound reason why the employee will not wear the PPE by considering:

  • is it uncomfortable to wear?
  • does it restrict movement?
  • does it create a greater risk from another hazard, compared to the one it is intended to protect against?
  • has the employee been made aware of why the PPE is needed and how to use it correctly?

As a last resort employers may need to instigate disciplinary proceedings - these should be part of the organisation's health and safety policy statement and employment conditions. The bottom line is that where the PPE is necessary to protect against a significant workplace risk the employer must take all reasonable steps to ensure that employees use it - this is the criterion judges will probably base any prosecutions or civil claims on.

Employers Solicitors is one of the top 25 legal websites in the UK - Source: Legal Technology Insider Magazine

Employment Law Headlines
Dismissal for out-of-hours activities:
In the November case of Pay v Lancashire Probation Service (Times, 27 November 2003 EAT) Mr Pay was a probation officer who in his spare time performed shows at 'hedonist and fetish clubs' and sold various bondage products through the internet.
» Read More ...

» News Archive

 
our experts have experience in a broad range of specialist areas
Absence from work
Career breaks
Long term absence
Short term absence
Changes in parental leave
Childcare
Paternity leave
Pregnancy
What are compromise agreements ?
Compromise agreements (CA)
Advice on CA
Legal obligations of a CA
Redundancy situations of a CA
Why use compromise agreements ?
Dismissal under contract
Employers breach of contract
Employers obligations
Employment agreements
Contracts of employment
Enforcing confidentiality
Equal pay
Flexible working
Guaranteed payments
Guarantee pay
National minimum wage
Offering new terms
Restrictive covenants
Statutory rights
Terminating employment
Variation of contract
Working time
Tribunal reforms
Disciplinary procedures
Suspending employees
Compensation for discrimination
Unfair treatment by unions
Complaints against union treatment
Disability discrimination
Equal pay law changes
Ethnic origin
Forms of discrimination
Race discrimination
Victimisation
What is discrimination ?
Workplace adjustments
Dismissal and criminal offences
Dismissal and health & safety
Illness related dismissal
Pregnancy & maternity dismissal
Dismissal and redundancy
Statutory employment rights
Sunday trading
Transfer issues
Transfers - conciliation
Transfers - employees position
Transfers - employers position
Transfers - employers obligations
Transfers - tribunal complaints
Transfers - consultation
Transfers - outline regulations
Transfers - redundancy issues
Transfers - right of representation
Transfers - trade unions
Transfers - transfers covered
Transfers - transfers not covered
Transfers - tribunal hearings
Europe - effect of the euro
Europe - legal regulation
Bullying and intimidation
Harassment - general information
Employers responsibility
Racial harassment
Sexual harassment
Sexual harassment - update
Health & safety (H&S) audit
H & S control measures
Dealing with accidents
H & S driving
H & S general information
H & S inspections
H & S job specifications
H & S monitoring
Occupational health
H & S policy
H & S risk assessments
Human rights
Human rights - main articles
IT - intranet benefits
IT - email & internet
Leaving - best practice
Leaving - consulting employees
Leaving - debriefing employees
Firing an employee
Planning redundancy
Redundancy
Redundancy consultation
Time off for interviews
Mergers - telling staff
Mergers - consulting staff
Mergers - avoiding mistakes
Mergers - HR barriers to success
Mergers - HR Problems
Mergers - Human resources
Corporate manslaughter
Dress code
Dressing down at work
Employers and stakeholder pensions
Updated stakeholder pensions
Self Employment
Outplacement
Sunday trading act 1994
Working time directives
 
© Employers-Solicitors.co.uk | privacy statement | about us | information for solicitors | solicitors login | site map
No win no fee does not apply to clinical or medical negligence cases. Separate arrangements will be made for the funding of
these cases and this will be discussed with you in detail before proceeding with your claim.