|
|
|
Planning redundancies |
 |
In an ideal situation the organisation
will have put in place clear policies concerning handling redundancy
issues well before they were needed.
There will have been discussions with management, employee representatives
and a subsequent human resource briefing paper and procedural
document. Relevant staff will have been trained in the procedures
and well-briefed. Clear measurement criteria will have been developed
to identify the progress of the programme, the resettlement rate
of leavers, the effect on business performance and morale of
the stayers.
The contents of any redundancy procedure will vary from organisation
to organisation. Planning needs to start as early as possible
and must be properly co-ordinated. For the management team, the
advantages of a redundancy programme are that it provides a joint
agreement for avoiding or minimising redundancies and for carrying
out such a measure after all other avenues have been exhausted.
This reduces the risk of conflict and can help to plan necessary
changes with less resistance.
For employees, a planned redundancy procedure will help to ensure
that all agreements are fair and consistent. The fear of the
unknown is reduced and there has been an opportunity for employee
groups to influence policy. This makes it far more likely that
the whole procedure can be adopted or "owned" by both
management and workforce alike.
The main features of any redundancy policy may be outlined as
follows.
- Establish with senior management the anticipated human
resource needs of the business both now and for the foreseeable
future.
- Conduct an audit with line-managers of
the current workforce in terms of competences matched
to the business need. Look
at age-ranges, experience and length of service.
- Complete a skills-gap
and headcount analysis between requirements/needs and supply. This might
include: reduced recruitment;
reduction of the use of contract/temporary staff; retraining; reducing
overtime.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|