|
|
|
Audit and inspection - FAQ |
 |
This is a simplified question and
answer section on the auditing of workplace health and safety.
Q. Is there a specific legal requirement to carry out safety
inspections?
A. No. However various legal duties placed on employers are difficult
to satisfy unless some form of inspection or other monitoring
of standards is carried out.
Q. Can we carry out audits ourselves or should we use a consultant?
A. Audits are generally recognised as best being done by someone
who has the knowledge and experience, who is impartial and who
is respected by the people being audited. Consultants can satisfy
these and other criteria but equally there may be people with
the desirable attributes within the organisation.
Q. How many different forms of workplace audits or inspections
are there?
A. Safety audits or inspections can take many forms. Every time
a manager walks around the area they are responsible for should
be a form of inspection as they should be on the lookout for
hazards, unsafe practices, etc. At the other end of the scale,
perhaps every three months, a manager, with people from the work
area, should use some form of checklist to carry out a more structured
inspection. There are various ways of carrying out inspections
in between. What is important is to use a variety of techniques
developed through experience to achieve good safety standards
in your own business. A good audit system will enable the auditor
to obtain all the necessary information without excessive decisions
being needed at the workplace. Many commercial systems exist,
either computer based or paper based, which provide an off the
shelf solution. Most of these can be tailored to suit the individual
requirements of a particular audit. The expense of these systems
must be balanced against the very real time and cost burden of
designing a system in-house. It is important to remember that
the record of the audit may be needed to prove compliance with
the requirements of the Management of Health and Safety at Work
Regulations 1992, and thus must, of itself, be adequate and credible.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|