|
|
|
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)- FAQ |
 |
Protective equipment is essential
in many lines of work if the employer is to adhere to Health
and Safety legislation.
Q. Do employers have to provide PPE free of charge?
A. Yes, s.9 of the HSW Act prohibits employers from charging
for PPE required to be provided under any health and safety laws.
This includes PPE identified as being necessary under the PPE
Regulations as a result of the risk assessments carried out under
MHSWR. Employers will also have better management of, and control
over, any PPE they provide and can therefore ensure that it is
maintained and replaced as required. However, in the case of
Associated Dairies Ltd v Hartley, an enforcement inspector was
found to have acted unreasonably by serving an improvement notice
requiring the employer to provide safety boots free of charge
to employees working in a certain area. The employer successfully
argued that the existing system of providing the boots at cost
price on a weekly repayment scheme (which was in line with trade
practice at the time) was adequate and reasonable in relation
to the risk.
Q. What determines whether PPE is suitable?
A. PPE is considered suitable if it is:
appropriate for, and effective against, the risks it is intended
to protect against
suitable for the environment in which it is intended to be used
adjustable to fit the user securely and comfortably.
Consideration should also be given to the need for communication,
mobility and use in confined spaces.
Q. Are any items of PPE excluded from the PPE Regulations?
A. Yes. The following items are excluded:
uniforms, eg for food hygiene purposes
work clothing which does not offer protection against identified
risks
sports equipment
crash helmets required under road traffic legislation.
Q. What if an employee refuses to wear PPE which is identified
as necessary and is provided by the employer?
A. There are several factors to consider. Under regulation 10
of the PPE Regulations, every employee is required to use any
PPE provided, and employers must take all reasonable steps to
ensure that PPE provided is used. Employees also have a duty
under s.7 of the HSW Act to ensure their own health and safety
at work. Refusing to wear PPE identified as necessary in order
to control exposure to certain workplace risks is a breach of
that duty and of the PPE Regulations. The employee could be liable
for prosecution. Employers must establish the grounds on which
the refusal has been made, and whether there is a sound reason
why the employee will not wear the PPE by considering:
* is it uncomfortable to wear?
* does it restrict movement?
* does it create a greater risk from another hazard, compared
to the one it is intended to protect against?
* has the employee been made aware of why the PPE is needed and
how to use it correctly?
As a last resort employers may need to instigate disciplinary
proceedings - these should be part of the organisation's health
and safety policy statement and employment conditions. The bottom
line is that where the PPE is necessary to protect against a
significant workplace risk the employer must take all reasonable
steps to ensure that employees use it - this is the criterion
judges will probably base any prosecutions or civil claims on.
Getting the employee to
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|